Science generally is a con. And I say this for two reasons. The first is blaringly obvious. Do you see it? It is hidden in the word CONSCIENCE. The Australian concise Oxford Dictionary: Conscience noun. 1 a moral sense of right and wrong esp. as felt by a person and affecting behaviour (my conscience won’t allow me to do that.) 2 an inner feeling as to the goodness or otherwise of one’s behaviour (my conscience is clear; has a guilty conscience). ∆ case of conscience a matter in which one’s conscience has to decide a conflict of principles.
“A moral sense of right and wrong”. Most people do know the difference between right and wrong, but some choose wrong over right, so why is this? A person who knowingly does wrong i.e. commits a crime such as rape, murder, any form of violence, damage to property and deception etc., pays no attention to his/her conscience. Our Creator gave human beings a conscience to guide us through life. If we follow our conscience, we will never do wrong by others and we can live in peace with our selves. Anyone who is war-mongering has not paid heed to their conscience. A conscience is all you need to guide you through life. Religion is for people who have not discovered their conscience and need to be told right from wrong; either by a person or from a book. However it is built into everyone’s soul. Anyone who holds to any religion, including Buddhism has not learned to rely on their conscience. You can easily tell this by the way millions have clung on to their religion in spite of the proliferation of paedophile priests. How many red flags need to appear before that unnecessary religion needs to be abandoned?
Now I come to the second reason: I want you to think about science in general. What scientific findings have resulted in fantastic benefits to humankind and the planet in general? If you think of anything at all to do with wars, fighting, killing or something that damages the environment or planet Earth, then that could not be construed as beneficial. If your mind turns to anything that pollutes, that is not beneficial. If you have to pollute to make a non-polluting product, that can’t count either.
Look around the world and tell me that science isn’t involved in all wars, bombs, guns, and planes, the very worst of polluters. Why do you think some people are protesting against CSG? These are people who listen to their conscience. It is telling them that the government has over-stepped their boundaries and are turning NSW into a POLICE State. The truth is, it is the People with a Conscience vs Government without a Conscience. The science behind Coal Seam Gas is a CON! To say that it is not dangerous is not just a lie, but a dreadful miscarriage of justice also. The government should be prosecuted over clear wrong doing and unethical practices. But the courts are full of people who do not listen to their consciences either. The Premier of NSW has a responsibility towards his citizens. Ordinary people are being violated by decisions made by the LNP State Government that are against the Human Rights of those citizens. And even when a suicide is identified as a result of the CSG scam, no changes have been made to eradicate all CSG mines in the state.
The Governor General must hold the highest title/position in the land. Am I right? Now if the Governor General was worth an iota of credibility, he would step in and dis-allow such approval of licences. Or he would dissolve Parliament. This is not going to happen because our Governor General does not listen to his conscience very often, and does not have the power. In fact he is powerless to do anything unless he is advised by the Queen or Prime Minister, which rarely happens for the good of all.
Now science has invented solar panels, which are beneficial, however there is a substantial amount of pollution in the making of them. If scientist had a conscience they could access, they would always find a remedy/solution for every negative outcome. Uranium should never have been sold to other countries in the first place and secondly should not be mined unless a suitable and ethical disposal has been proven satisfactory in every respect.
What else has science invented or discovered that has benefited all humanity without any destruction in the process? Certainly not rockets. And all those trillions that has been spent on Space Missions in the US, is that of more benefit to humanity than housing and feeding the homeless, eradicating guns or tackling domestic violence? The FDA is a scam. Those that run and work for the FDA do not listen to their conscience. Neither does the TGA. They approve what is harmful and place restrictions on all things natural. The TGA has no idea about what is beneficial to human kind and only operates where advantage is gained.
Tell me the scientific nutritional value of white sugar. Of course there should be a tax on all harmful things and no tax on beneficial things. Ask anyone with a conscience and they will agree. That is not only logical and ethical, but it is practical as well. If sugar is made a luxury item, the population’s health will definitely improve.
If a man assumes that he is superior to all women just by way of his penis, he is sadly mistaken. Such a man is not listening to his conscience. If a man thinks he can treat a woman like a slave or feels that he owns her, he is not accessing his conscience. Such a man has no understanding of karma and will plough on doing things he knows by law are a crime, but he doesn’t care because he is a man and it is a male ‘right’. Then when born in their next incarnation as a severely disable person, they wonder “why me?” People scoff at reincarnation, but they are just displaying their spiritual ignorance. Just as a paedophile priest knows he is doing wrong, but he does it anyway and often accompanied by violence which apparently gives them a thrill. Paedophile priests don’t believe in the god of the bible. They are all atheists that have landed a cushy job where they do practically nothing and lead a lascivious life in luxury tax free.
The truly alarming fact is that many politicians cling on to their beliefs without really knowing why. It’s the ‘done’ thing in their circle. They go to church at Easter and on Christmas Day, so that they can be seen to be pious when they are really far from it.
Hasn’t anyone wondered why a parishioner can’t put up their hand and ask a question in church? The priests don’t know the answer to anything off the cuff. Everything is rehearsed. If they are so ordained, shouldn’t they already know everything? If they followed their conscience they would know. Religions have been extremely harmful to humanity. Their doctrines are absurd to a conscience following human. How can a priest be ordained by god, when they have never met god or seen god? And why would any god ordain a paedophile?
Why do people adore the Pope? He is just an ordinary human being with foibles, misdemeanours and ignorance to deal with. He is not always right. He is not above all humans. He is not the wisest human on the planet. Yet people are sucked in by hype, pomp and ceremony. These people especially need to tune into their consciences.
Science isn’t at all stable. What was right last decade need not be right any more. Take Ibuprofen for instance. It has just been announced that giving your child Ibuprofen may now be harmful and are advising against it. Yet ads are still running saying that it is safe to give to babies. I have never given any form of pain killer to my children. I consider that to be exceptionally harmful and child abuse.
Therein lies the danger of our present vaccine policy.
The American Academy of Paediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice have both endorsed a growing list of vaccines for children, even newborns, as well as yearly flu shots for both children and adults. Children are receiving as many as 22 inoculations before attending school.
What Happens When the Brain’s Immune System is Activated? By Dr Russell Blaylock
The brain’s immune system cells, once activated, begin to move about the nervous system, secreting numerous immune chemicals (called cytokines and chemokines) and pouring out an enormous amount of free radicals in an effort to kill invading organisms. The problem is–there is no invading organisms. It has been tricked by the vaccine into believing there are.
Unlike the body’s immune system, the microglia also secrete two other chemicals that are very destructive to brain cells and their connecting processes. These chemicals, glutamate and quinolinic acid, are called excitotoxins. They also dramatically increase free radical generation in the rise to very dangerous levels in the brain following viral and bacterial infections of the brain. High quinolinic acid levels in the brain are thought to be the cause of the dementia seen with HIV infection.
The problem with our present vaccine policy is that so many vaccines are being given so close together and over such a long period that the brain’s immune system is constantly activated. This has been shown experimentally in numerous studies. This means that the brain will be exposed to large amounts of the excitotoxins as well as the immune cytokines over the same period.
Studies on all of these disorders, even in autism, have shown high levels of immune cytokines and excitotoxins in the nervous system. These destructive chemicals, as well as the free radicals they generate, are diffused throughout the nervous system doing damage, a process called bystander injury. It’s sort of like throwing a bomb in a crowd.
Normally, the brain’s immune system, like the body’s, activates quickly and then promptly shuts off to minimize the bystander damage. Vaccination won’t let the microglia shut down. In the developing brain, this can lead to language problems, behavioural dysfunction, and even dementia. In the adult, it can lead to the Gulf War Syndrome or one of the more common neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s dementia, or Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS). Dr Russel Blaylock.
Of course we are using scientific inventions all the time every day. The telephone was great, but the mobile is not so great and still a worry due to tumours forming in people’s brains but not yet fully attributed to mobile phones. A tumour does not form for no reason at all. There is always a reason, though it may not be readily discernible.
Unfortunately doctors do not study health. They study disease. We have a Health Care System that deals with Ill Health, not health. Naturopaths deal in health. They want you to get well. They don’t need to keep you sick in order to keep their jobs. They are interested in curing you for good. The medical profession are keeping enough people sick to keep naturopaths in work for the rest of their lives.
Big Pharma are not interested in curing anyone. They ‘manage’ your disease so that you have to be on their medication for the rest of your life. Every doctor knows that every pharmaceutical medication has numerous side effects. Some are mild, some not so mild, some severe and some fatal. Yet they plod on unencumbered. But try buying a comfrey plant and what???? It’s illegal to plant a comfrey plant in your vegetable garden? Yes it is, and I have one in my garden and I eat comfrey nearly every day. No one ever died from eating comfrey. No one ever died from using cannabis/marijuana either. The science behind cannabis is another con. Sections of the community do not like cannabis/marijuana users, so it’s illegal, not because of any dangers from its use. Those that uphold the law are not tuned in to their conscience. Deep down they know the truth that marijuana is safe and alcohol is dangerous, but this section of the community all drink alcohol, mostly responsibly. But marijuana users cannot sit quietly in their own home, minding their own business and have even just one joint. That apparently is so confronting and dangerous and in no way compares to a king hit by a drunk. Need I say more about that!
Very dangerous laws are being passed in Australia. Very dangerous and harmful legislation is being passed such as TPP. And in State Laws such as in NSW anti protesting laws are turning this country into a Gestapo State. Is that what we really want? And all this is being done by a dishonest government. This is a government who hides their donations as they know that the donations are not only not legal, but unethical. So I am going to ask you to think about what I have said here and try to argue a case against me, using your conscience. It will be clear if you are not tuned into your conscience. You will feel it when you are not. The term, ‘my conscience has been pricked’ means that a person has been thinking thoughts without conscience awareness, then awareness kicks in and pricks the conscience and the person has a change of mind. To any scientist reading this, I am not against ethical science; science with a conscience. I am against con science, science that damages.