ISLAM vs The WEST

World War 111 began the day ISIL/Daesh declared a Caliphate. Nostradamus predicted a 3rd world war at the end of the last century, so what if he was in error by a few years.

This world war is very different from the last two and that is to be expected. However ISIL are employing very basic tactics such as knifing and beheading. Not high tech at all. I put Islam before The West in the heading as it is ISIL declaring war on the West, not the other way around. However, American foreign policy certainly has a lot to answer for. America did invade Iraq; did land troops without permission from the government and did kill insurgents defending their country. They also killed a huge amount of civilians. This was antagonistic to say the least and this outcome to be expected.

The US, Russia and China are employing high tech. Unmanned drones, satellite surveillance and various weaponry. However, ISIL are employing both. They have the high tech weaponry which they have mostly stolen, or bought with ill gotten gains.

Let me explain how in many ways ISIL have the advantage in this war, whereas no one had a clear advantage in the previous wars before Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The clear advantage with ISIL is their appearance, clothing and support amongst the community of any nation including Syria and Iraq.

Let’s say that the US decides to put boots on the ground in Syria. How do Syrians dress and visually appear? How would a US soldier differentiate between a Syrian opposed to the Assad government or to a Syrian supporter of ISIL or to a Syrian who supports Bashar al Assad? Putting a soldier dressed in fatigues in any town in Syria would be suicide and a waste of a good man. It just can’t be done. ISIL, those that oppose Assad and those that support him have a network. They know the cities they live in and they have accommodation. Where are the soldiers accommodated?

Now take an ISIL supporter in a non-Muslim country such as Australia. We allow people to wear what they like as long as they don’t expose their genitals and women their breasts. So even though Muslims dress very differently, we have allowed them not to stick out like a soldier would in his fatigues in Syria. No one expects a young man in his teens, dressed in Muslim traditional dress to pull out a gun and shoot dead someone he doesn’t even know. We have allowed ourselves to be trusting of all newcomers, refugees and migrants, because some of them have been lovely and Australia is the richer for their presence.

I can fully support the closed door policy Australia has adopted. We have every right to choose who we let enter Australian borders. It was the open door policy that has allowed Extremists to blend in, when they should be as conspicuous as the US soldier in his fatigues.

If a member of the KKK came to Australia and wore his KKK garb with hood on in Pit St Sydney, he would be arrested or at least detained. But this man may not have hurt or killed anyone. White headdress apparently, is unacceptable in society, but black is acceptable. Now why is this?

It is true that there are countries that ISIL/Daesh, Taliban, al Qaeda, Jamaah Islamiyah, Hezbollah, Hamas and Boko Haram etc. have not penetrated. These are countries with a limited Muslim population.

Very few Islamists love our way of life. If they did they would dress like us and not feel the need to cover 90% of their body. Both men and women cover up so I don’t know where they get their vitamin D from. I was told by a Muslim man that the reason why they wear baggy pants and the long shirt worn over them was so that they can masturbate without being detected. Another Muslim man told me that if a man should by some miraculous occurrence give birth to the return of Mohamed, the baby will have a soft landing in his pants. Now this man had no sense of humour and laughing was inappropriate for my safety. As I was in his country, Pakistan, I just let it go, even though he was my friend at the time.

ISIL are Islamic Extremists. It’s their way or the highway. They are not Muslim by faith, though of course they say they are. They are men who thrive on control. Control over women, over children, over money, over property and over behaviour of all the population. They are on a huge Power Trip with no conscience being adhered to. The more brazen they are, the more they get away with. Very similar to domestic violence where the man controls his partner and children and is violent towards them, but there isn’t a consequence; where a restraining order is broken without consequence and where an extremist is suspected, but free to commit a heinous crime. If Islamists keep getting their way with little resistance, think what life will be like for white Australians and Original Inhabitants if Islamists multiply as Indians did in Fiji. There is a group of women already calling for Sharia Law in Australia. Of course it will not happen. Or could it? All it takes is a Muslim government that becomes an Islamist Government. Alarmist? Perhaps. But I will tell you one thing. Those that think about many scenarios are more prepared psychologically than those who never gave it a thought: ‘It’ being an event or consequence of certain actions.

Only a very under developed brain would believe the 72 virgins in Heaven waiting for every martyr. Under developed brains are particularly dangerous as they can justify anything with utter rubbish. In other words they are gullible. How else can you explain the 72 virgins myth? I have been to the highest plane on the Astral Plane and there are very few virgins there and those that are definitely are NOT at the disposal of any martyr. There are no martyrs on the 7th Plane. They are mostly on the 1st or 2nd Plane: 1st commonly known as Hell.

If we can eliminate the need for oil and eradicate greed the world would be in a much better position. Two things easily achieved, but probably never will be.

Turkey was a secular country. Since the coup, it will be an Islamist State. That’s how quickly it can happen.

Not wanting more Muslims entering Australia does not mean that I don’t like Muslims or that I hate them. Those that have integrated such as you see with Waleed Aly are very welcome and appreciated. Those that do not integrate and rely on Centrelink may cause some problems for those that feel that they aren’t getting a fair go. I certainly do not advocate for all Muslims to be deported. That is ridiculous. I just feel that there are enough here already. Just as you may eat a delicious mud cake, if someone offers you more, even though it’s delicious, you don’t want any more.

 

  1. I have been pilloried on Twitter for my views. This is quite to be expected, however it does seem strange that those that have read my blog do not comment and put forward their own views, which I appreciate. Many have read this blog, then return to twitter and condemn me, where they receive a wide audience who back them up having not read my blog. I have been told that I am spewing hatred. I’m quite sure if I felt hatred I would know it. Apparently I am disgusting and one ‘man’ put #basketofdeplorables against my name. Of course there is no hatred shown towards me, is there? It is just my opinion that it is best not to vilify, demonise or use vile language at someone whose ideas you are trying to change.

I am not changing my mind on Islam, Muslims, Christians or Jews. I have come to my views after careful thought and meditation. I have a Right to want and need to live in the country that I am used to, grew up in and not one that is completely changing before my eyes and I have no in-put?

What a difference a c can make. My computer keyboard put a space between the c in changing and produced the word hanging. Now I could have thought of my clothes hanging in my wardrobe, but because of the above blog, my mind went directly to hangings and beheadings. The people who have pilloried me have no fear of terrorists. How will you feel when you yourself are caught up in such an event? A very good friend of my oldest daughter was blown up by a suicide bomber in Egypt. She was on holidays and was covered in shrapnel from face, neck, chest, stomach, thighs, shins and feet. A beautiful young woman, I have met her. It happened on the same day as the Tasmanian Coal mine disaster which took the limelight. I deplore the actions of violence of any kind. I don’t know how I will feel if I pass a man wearing a skull cap, Muslim clothes, short hair and big bushy black beard. I may feel a pang of fear, especially if there were more than one. I may instantly work on a plan if anything untoward should happen. I would not walk alone in Lakemba for instance. Only a decade ago, I felt I could safely walk anywhere. How about those of you who view me with utter disdain, go to Lakemba and walk around alone for 3 hours and see how you are treated and see who is racist and how they are dressed. Has anyone got a clue? Islamists are racist and they live in our country. They do want everyone to do as they do, which is contrary to my choice in life which I have a right to.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

About Cannabis/Marijuana

  Why should I feel anxious and nervous about being caught growing cannabis on my own land? When all I am doing is growing a herb that God provided for all human beings and animals to do freel…

Source: About Cannabis/Marijuana

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

About Cannabis/Marijuana

 

Why should I feel anxious and nervous about being caught growing cannabis on my own land? When all I am doing is growing a herb that God provided for all human beings and animals to do freely what they like with. Meaning that man-made drugs/pharmaceuticals, all with disturbing and dangerous side effects are beneficial to humans and animals, and that all natural, organic bush cannabis is harmful? This is absurd and illogical. The TGA is not ethical in its duty either.

 

So what is the exact point of arresting someone for smoking a joint or pipe of organic all natural marijuana? I oppose the use of hydro, however it should be allowed for those who prefer it, as long as they obey the law, all is well. There are no known severe side effects from organic marijuana use whether in the form of smokable material, oil or tincture. You do not get more and more stoned the more you smoke. You reach a limit where you become slower than normal and may fall asleep, but only where it was appropriate to do so. Some people may like this effect, I for one do not. Everything can be overdone. You can be a workaholic and lose your marriage because of it, but it’s still legal. You can over-do work in other ways and damage your body, but that’s allowed.

I have no idea why some people frown on marijuana use. What is the fear of? I fear drunks, I can tell you that I am terrified of drunks. They are irrational and unpredictable and you cannot reason with them. You can always reason with a stoner and if they are intelligent, you can have an intelligent conversation stoned. It may have more funny bits, but what’s the terrible harm in that?

 

This herb is illegal for what exact reason? Is it illegal because no one has ever died from using it in any form? Or is it because Big Pharma can’t patent it? And now what they are doing is growing GMO cannabis that will be far inferior to home grown organic bush cannabis. These are two very important points to be discussed and valid reasons and conclusions to be drwn; not just to me, but to all marijuana users. If you are against legalisation of cannabis/marijuana give a valid reason as to why it should remain illegal and alcohol by comparison is not.

 

Please supply an exact figure on how many disgusting behaviour related incidences involving public vomiting, defecating, urinating and acts of extreme violence that have led to arrests from the use of marijuana. The exact figure is already known: It is zero. I bet you thought I was going to say alcohol.

 

Now please supply an approximate figure when alcohol is the villain. The figure is not only not zero, but cannot be calculated, as no records are being kept; simply because it is so prevalent every day of every week, month and year.

 

The exact figure from deaths related to cannabis/marijuana use is zero. What a miserable wretched herb this is, being so benign. (Sarcasm).

 

The exact figure for deaths resulting from alcohol abuse is…..wait for it…incalculable! It is incalculable because the figure is so frightening that no one has dared to find out or keep record. This has to include the deadly one hit coward punch, murder in the form of domestic violence, where men are the main perpetrators. Drunk driving where not only the drunkard is killed, but very often people who do not drink alcohol and live exemplary lives are killed by the drunk. It also must include illnesses that result in death from alcohol abuse, such as cirrhosis of the liver, perforated bowel, delirium tremens and accidents. NO RECORDS ARE BEING KEPT! The figure could be in the millions for the last decade, yet the figure for marijuana use is still zero. What are you afraid of? No rational and logical thinking person could possibly find fault with it.

 

But there are those that don’t get it yet. They have demonised, criminalised and persecuted cannabis users, regardless of the reasons they were using it for. Nope! Not interested. Was it to help them sleep? Couldn’t care less could they? Would it be to listen to music in it’s entirety to appreciate all that stuff you miss when not stoned? Oh that’s just bullshit to spiritually impoverished beings though, but unfortunately they have the POWER.

 

How terrifying is this plant that it can be continually demonised by the alcohol supporting public, police and politicians? We the people of the ‘Free World’ need answers and we need them now. There is no freedom in bad laws.

 

We need to know why this conspiracy has gone on for so long. We need to be told in all truthfulness that not one law maker was an alcoholic. We need to be told that not one alcohol supplier/producer was involved in any way, subtle or conspicuous, overt or covert in keeping cannabis as illegal. For goodness sake, even the Americans have legalised it in some states and they started this stupid drug law. It should not be the drug that is illegal, but the actions of the user.

 

Is money a factor, contributions from companies who do not want cannabis as competition? How do we get to the truth? Is there any graft? What is the position of cigarette companies? Who is lying to make marijuana look bad? We need answers.

 

Has there ever been an arrest and prosecution of a person delivering a one punch king hit from smoking marijuana alone? Don’t give figures that include alcohol and other drugs consumed as well. They do not count. The answer is already known. None. None. Zilch. Nil. Zero. But this figure which is the least available in the equation is met with shock/horror. Somehow it isn’t the point and their point is the valid one, even though they don’t even have a point. A woman I know told me that marijuana sent her friend’s son crazy. I should have said ‘prove it’, but I didn’t want to seem insensitive. There is no proof that the boy would not have gone crazy if he never tried marijuana and who knows what else he took that he never disclosed.

 

And how is it that all these so called experts who have never even tried to use the substance decry it as wicked and threatening? What are they comparing it to? Vegetables? Water? Some people are allergic to vegetables and fruit, grains and dairy. And water can be contaminated. So I would place cannabis above those.

 

Why aren’t all of the above made illegal? Why this herb? Don’t make the claim that it affects memory. I am 74 years old and I can memorise a whole deck of 52 cards and I only go through them every 3 months or so. Millions of people have a much worse memory than I do; those who have never smoked in their lives. I have smoked over a period of 47 years. I never smoked during pregnancy nor when I had babies and toddlers. I am a responsible smoker. However, having said that, even an irresponsible smoker is unlikely to do any harm to themselves, to anyone else or to property. I am healthy, fit and youthful. I run rings around my alcohol drinking friends. And why is it that the opinion is never sort from casual smokers and always from addicts? Addicts are not all marijuana smokers. There are all sorts of addicts: such as food, (obese people). Sex, cigarettes, yes alcohol, work, stealing and hard drugs. Yet there are places called Needle Exchange Centres, where a person can go to inject an illegal drug that they bring with them that is very dangerous; get given needles free of charge and not be prosecuted. Why oh why is that? No logic when you compare that to a person sitting quietly in their own house or on their own land smoking a joint or pipe/bong and listening to music, not harming anyone or causing any problems.

 

It is a well-known fact that most politicians, police and experts are alcohol dependent. I am not dependent on marijuana. I go for days without having a smoke; weeks even, though I have plenty on hand. But so what for those that are. Some use it for pain and others to de stress. Is that so awful? Take pharmaceutical pain killers and you could end up with a stomach haemorrhage, like my father who almost died but for a 6 pints of blood transfusion. That’s ok though, it’s legal. Who going to care about it?

The vast amount of funds being thrown at the eradication of cannabis is disproportionate to funds being thrown at cannabis/marijuana understanding. Ask any doctor in any hospital in this country, which is the villain out of alcohol and marijuana. We know the answer, don’t we?!

So let me compare the pair. Below is a list of traits for both alcohol and Cannabis/marijuana use.

Alcohol Cannabis/marijuana
Many drink to get drunk and lose control. Many smoke to get stoned and become more cautious & careful. And to laugh more. Comedies are funnier when stoned.
A drunk can’t walk in a straight line. A stoner can walk in a straight line.
A drunk slurs their speech and loses a grip on reality. A stoner articulates just as well when stoned. However they may laugh more.
Drunk drivers kill innocent people. Stoners drive extra carefully when stoned, if they drive at all.
Drunks become uninhibited, reckless and obnoxious. Stoners may become less sexually inhibited, but usually it’s a good thing.
Drunks often become aggressive. Stoners become laid back pacifists.
Drunks often wet themselves. Stoners never wet themselves.
Drunks often damage property. Stoners look after property & people.
Drunks are scary people. Stoners never frighten me.
Drunks verbally abuse Stoners often swear, but just in conversation. They do not use abusive language unless threatened.
Drunks have no regard for anyone. Stoners have regard for those who deserve it.
Drunks are often looking for a fight. Stoners would rather listen to music than fight, unless to save their life.
Drunks can’t think straight. Stoners often use marijuana to think with a different view point. To solve problems. I know I do think clearer.
Alcohol promotes free radicles. Marijuana may also promote free radicles if used to excess. But not nearly to the same degree as alcohol.
There are no healing agents in alcohol. Wine contains a few anti-oxidants that’s all. Cannabis is a healer of many ailments when taken as a tincture or as oil internally.
Alcoholism causes many ailments. Cauliflower nose for one. Cannabis does not cause any diseases at all. It is a God given healer.

 

 

The Unwise vs the wise. In other words the Right vs the Left. The Left being the wiser.

The world is full of unwise, unintelligent and unuseful people. They lack the ‘knowhow’ to work out right from wrong for themselves. They have to be told and unfortunately have often been told by paedophile priests and the like whom they erroneously trusted. Without the wisdom to recognise a fraud, an imposter or religious zealot,         how can they dare to judge me?

 

Posted in Uncategorized, War on Drugs | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Islam vs The West

World War 111 began the day ISIL/Daesh declared a Caliphate. Nostradamus predicted a 3rd world war at the end of the last century, so what if he was in error by a few years.

This world war is very different from the last two and that is to be expected. However ISIL are employing very basic tactics such as knifing and beheading. Not high tech at all. I put ISIL before The West in the heading as it is ISIL declaring war on the West, not the other way around. However, American foreign policy certainly has a lot to answer for. America did invade Iraq; did land troops without permission from the government and did kill insurgents defending their country. They also killed a huge amount of civilians. This was antagonistic to say the least and this outcome to be expected.

The US, Russia and China are employing high tech. Unmanned drones, satellite surveillance and various weaponry. However, ISIL are employing both. They have the high tech weaponry which they have mostly stolen, or bought with ill gotten gains.

Let me explain how in many ways ISIL have the advantage in this war, whereas no one had a clear advantage in the previous wars before Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The clear advantage with ISIL is their appearance, clothing and support amongst the community of any nation including Syria and Iraq.

Let’s say that the US decides to put boots on the ground in Syria. How do Syrians dress and visually appear? How would a US soldier differentiate between a Syrian opposed to the Assad government or to a Syrian supporter of ISIL or to a Syrian who supports Bashar al Assad? Putting a soldier dressed in fatigues in any town in Syria would be suicide and a waste of a good man. It just can’t be done. ISIL, those that oppose Assad and those that support him have a network. They know the cities they live in and they have accommodation. Where are the soldiers accommodated?

Now take an ISIL supporter in a non-Muslim country such as Australia. We allow people to wear what they like as long as they don’t expose their genitals and women their breasts. So even though Muslims dress very differently, we have allowed them not to stick out like a soldier would in his fatigues in Syria. No one expects a young man in his teens, dressed in Muslim traditional dress to pull out a gun and shoot dead someone he doesn’t even know. We have allowed ourselves to be trusting of all newcomers, refugees and migrants, because some of them have been lovely and Australia is the richer for their presence.

I can fully support the closed door policy Australia has adopted. We have every right to choose who we let enter Australian borders. It was the open door policy that has allowed Extremists to blend in, when they should be as conspicuous as the US soldier in his fatigues.

If a member of the KKK came to Australia and wore his KKK garb with hood on in Pit St Sydney, he would be arrested or at least detained. But this man may not have hurt or killed anyone. White headdress apparently, is unacceptable in society, but black is acceptable. Now why is this?

It is true that there are countries that ISIL/Desh, Taliban, al Qaeda, Jamaah Islamiyah, Hezbollah, Hamas and Boko Haram etc. have not penetrated. These are countries with a limited Muslim population.

Very few Islamists love our way of life. If they did they would dress like us and not feel the need to cover 90% of their body. Both men and women cover up so I don’t know where they get their vitamin D from. I was told by a Muslim man that the reason why they wear baggy pants and the long shirt worn over them was so that they can masturbate without being detected. Another Muslim man told me that if a man should by some miraculous occurrence give birth to the return of Mohamed, the baby will have a soft landing in his pants. Now this man had no sense of humour and laughing was inappropriate for my safety. As I was in his country, Pakistan, I just let it go, even though he was my friend at the time.

ISIL are Islamic Extremists. It’s their way or the highway. They are not Muslim by faith, though of course they say they are. They are men who thrive on control. Control over women, over children, over money, over property and over behaviour of all the population. They are on a huge Power Trip with no conscience being adhered to. The more brazen they are, the more they get away with. Very similar to domestic violence where the man controls his partner and children and is violent towards them, but there isn’t a consequence; where a restraining order is broken without consequence and where an extremist is suspected, but free to commit a heinous crime. If Islamist keep getting their way with little resistance, think what life will be like for white Australians and Original Inhabitants if Islamists multiply as Indians did in Fiji. There is a group of women already calling for Sharia Law in Australia. Of course it will not happen. Or could it? All it takes is a Muslim government that becomes an Islamist Government. Alarmist? Perhaps. But I will tell you one thing. Those that think about many scenarios are more prepared psychologically than those who never gave it a thought: ‘It’ being an event or consequence of certain actions.

Only a very under developed brain would believe the 72 virgins in Heaven waiting for every martyr. Under developed brains are particularly dangerous as they can justify anything with utter rubbish. In other words they are gullible. How else can you explain the 72 virgins myth? I have been to the highest plane on the Astral Plane and there are very few virgins there and those that are definitely are NOT at the disposal of any martyr. There are no martyrs on the 7th Plane. They are mostly on the 1st or 2nd Plane: 1st commonly known as Hell.

If we can eliminate the need for oil and eradicate greed the world would be in a much better position. Two things easily achieved, but probably never will be.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Con-Science

Science generally is a con. And I say this for two reasons. The first is blaringly obvious. Do you see it? It is hidden in the word CONSCIENCE. The Australian concise Oxford Dictionary: Conscience noun. 1 a moral sense of right and wrong esp. as felt by a person and affecting behaviour (my conscience won’t allow me to do that.) 2 an inner feeling as to the goodness or otherwise of one’s behaviour (my conscience is clear; has a guilty conscience). ∆ case of conscience a matter in which one’s conscience has to decide a conflict of principles.

“A moral sense of right and wrong”. Most people do know the difference between right and wrong, but some choose wrong over right, so why is this? A person who knowingly does wrong i.e. commits a crime such as rape, murder, any form of violence, damage to property and deception etc., pays no attention to his/her conscience. Our Creator gave human beings a conscience to guide us through life. If we follow our conscience, we will never do wrong by others and we can live in peace with our selves. Anyone who is war-mongering has not paid heed to their conscience. A conscience is all you need to guide you through life. Religion is for people who have not discovered their conscience and need to be told right from wrong; either by a person or from a book. However it is built into everyone’s soul. Anyone who holds to any religion, including Buddhism has not learned to rely on their conscience. You can easily tell this by the way millions have clung on to their religion in spite of the proliferation of paedophile priests. How many red flags need to appear before that unnecessary religion needs to be abandoned?

Now I come to the second reason: I want you to think about science in general. What scientific findings have resulted in fantastic benefits to humankind and the planet in general? If you think of anything at all to do with wars, fighting, killing or something that damages the environment or planet Earth, then that could not be construed as beneficial. If your mind turns to anything that pollutes, that is not beneficial. If you have to pollute to make a non-polluting product, that can’t count either.

Look around the world and tell me that science isn’t involved in all wars, bombs, guns, and planes, the very worst of polluters. Why do you think some people are protesting against CSG? These are people who listen to their conscience. It is telling them that the government has over-stepped their boundaries and are turning NSW into a POLICE State. The truth is, it is the People with a Conscience vs Government without a Conscience. The science behind Coal Seam Gas is a CON! To say that it is not dangerous is not just a lie, but a dreadful miscarriage of justice also. The government should be prosecuted over clear wrong doing and unethical practices. But the courts are full of people who do not listen to their consciences either. The Premier of NSW has a responsibility towards his citizens. Ordinary people are being violated by decisions made by the LNP State Government that are against the Human Rights of those citizens. And even when a suicide is identified as a result of the CSG scam, no changes have been made to eradicate all CSG mines in the state.

The Governor General must hold the highest title/position in the land. Am I right? Now if the Governor General was worth an iota of credibility, he would step in and dis-allow such approval of licences. Or he would dissolve Parliament. This is not going to happen because our Governor General does not listen to his conscience very often, and does not have the power. In fact he is powerless to do anything unless he is advised by the Queen or Prime Minister, which rarely happens for the good of all.

Now science has invented solar panels, which are beneficial, however there is a substantial amount of pollution in the making of them. If scientist had a conscience they could access, they would always find a remedy/solution for every negative outcome. Uranium should never have been sold to other countries in the first place and secondly should not be mined unless a suitable and ethical disposal has been proven satisfactory in every respect.

What else has science invented or discovered that has benefited all humanity without any destruction in the process? Certainly not rockets. And all those trillions that has been spent on Space Missions in the US, is that of more benefit to humanity than housing and feeding the homeless, eradicating guns or tackling domestic violence? The FDA is a scam. Those that run and work for the FDA do not listen to their conscience. Neither does the TGA. They approve what is harmful and place restrictions on all things natural. The TGA has no idea about what is beneficial to human kind and only operates where advantage is gained.

Tell me the scientific nutritional value of white sugar. Of course there should be a tax on all harmful things and no tax on beneficial things. Ask anyone with a conscience and they will agree. That is not only logical and ethical, but it is practical as well. If sugar is made a luxury item, the population’s health will definitely improve.

If a man assumes that he is superior to all women just by way of his penis, he is sadly mistaken. Such a man is not listening to his conscience. If a man thinks he can treat a woman like a slave or feels that he owns her, he is not accessing his conscience. Such a man has no understanding of karma and will plough on doing things he knows by law are a crime, but he doesn’t care because he is a man and it is a male ‘right’. Then when born in their next incarnation as a severely disable person, they wonder “why me?” People scoff at reincarnation, but they are just displaying their spiritual ignorance. Just as a paedophile priest knows he is doing wrong, but he does it anyway and often accompanied by violence which apparently gives them a thrill. Paedophile priests don’t believe in the god of the bible. They are all atheists that have landed a cushy job where they do practically nothing and lead a lascivious life in luxury tax free.

The truly alarming fact is that many politicians cling on to their beliefs without really knowing why. It’s the ‘done’ thing in their circle. They go to church at Easter and on Christmas Day, so that they can be seen to be pious when they are really far from it.

Hasn’t anyone wondered why a parishioner can’t put up their hand and ask a question in church? The priests don’t know the answer to anything off the cuff. Everything is rehearsed. If they are so ordained, shouldn’t they already know everything? If they followed their conscience they would know. Religions have been extremely harmful to humanity. Their doctrines are absurd to a conscience following human. How can a priest be ordained by god, when they have never met god or seen god? And why would any god ordain a paedophile?

Why do people adore the Pope? He is just an ordinary human being with foibles, misdemeanours and ignorance to deal with. He is not always right. He is not above all humans. He is not the wisest human on the planet. Yet people are sucked in by hype, pomp and ceremony. These people especially need to tune into their consciences.

Science isn’t at all stable. What was right last decade need not be right any more. Take Ibuprofen for instance. It has just been announced that giving your child Ibuprofen may now be harmful and are advising against it. Yet ads are still running saying that it is safe to give to babies. I have never given any form of pain killer to my children. I consider that to be exceptionally harmful and child abuse.

Therein lies the danger of our present vaccine policy.

The American Academy of Paediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice have both endorsed a growing list of vaccines for children, even newborns, as well as yearly flu shots for both children and adults. Children are receiving as many as 22 inoculations before attending school.

What Happens When the Brain’s Immune System is Activated?      By   Dr Russell Blaylock

The brain’s immune system cells, once activated, begin to move about the nervous system, secreting numerous immune chemicals (called cytokines and chemokines) and pouring out an enormous amount of free radicals in an effort to kill invading organisms. The problem is–there is no invading organisms. It has been tricked by the vaccine into believing there are.

Unlike the body’s immune system, the microglia also secrete two other chemicals that are very destructive to brain cells and their connecting processes. These chemicals, glutamate and quinolinic acid, are called excitotoxins. They also dramatically increase free radical generation in the rise to very dangerous levels in the brain following viral and bacterial infections of the brain. High quinolinic acid levels in the brain are thought to be the cause of the dementia seen with HIV infection.

The problem with our present vaccine policy is that so many vaccines are being given so close together and over such a long period that the brain’s immune system is constantly activated. This has been shown experimentally in numerous studies. This means that the brain will be exposed to large amounts of the excitotoxins as well as the immune cytokines over the same period.

Studies on all of these disorders, even in autism, have shown high levels of immune cytokines and excitotoxins in the nervous system. These destructive chemicals, as well as the free radicals they generate, are diffused throughout the nervous system doing damage, a process called bystander injury. It’s sort of like throwing a bomb in a crowd.

Normally, the brain’s immune system, like the body’s, activates quickly and then promptly shuts off to minimize the bystander damage. Vaccination won’t let the microglia shut down. In the developing brain, this can lead to language problems, behavioural dysfunction, and even dementia. In the adult, it can lead to the Gulf War Syndrome or one of the more common neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s dementia, or Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS).       Dr Russel Blaylock.

Of course we are using scientific inventions all the time every day. The telephone was great, but the mobile is not so great and still a worry due to tumours forming in people’s brains but not yet fully attributed to mobile phones. A tumour does not form for no reason at all. There is always a reason, though it may not be readily discernible.

Unfortunately doctors do not study health. They study disease. We have a Health Care System that deals with Ill Health, not health. Naturopaths deal in health. They want you to get well. They don’t need to keep you sick in order to keep their jobs. They are interested in curing you for good. The medical profession are keeping enough people sick to keep naturopaths in work for the rest of their lives.

Big Pharma are not interested in curing anyone. They ‘manage’ your disease so that you have to be on their medication for the rest of your life. Every doctor knows that every pharmaceutical medication has numerous side effects. Some are mild, some not so mild, some severe and some fatal. Yet they plod on unencumbered. But try buying a comfrey plant and what???? It’s illegal to plant a comfrey plant in your vegetable garden? Yes it is, and I have one in my garden and I eat comfrey nearly every day. No one ever died from eating comfrey. No one ever died from using cannabis/marijuana either. The science behind cannabis is another con. Sections of the community do not like cannabis/marijuana users, so it’s illegal, not because of any dangers from its use. Those that uphold the law are not tuned in to their conscience. Deep down they know the truth that marijuana is safe and alcohol is dangerous, but this section of the community all drink alcohol, mostly responsibly. But marijuana users cannot sit quietly in their own home, minding their own business and have even just one joint. That apparently is so confronting and dangerous and in no way compares to a king hit by a drunk. Need I say more about that!

Very dangerous laws are being passed in Australia. Very dangerous and harmful legislation is being passed such as TPP. And in State Laws such as in NSW anti protesting laws are turning this country into a Gestapo State. Is that what we really want? And all this is being done by a dishonest government. This is a government who hides their donations as they know that the donations are not only not legal, but unethical. So I am going to ask you to think about what I have said here and try to argue a case against me, using your conscience. It will be clear if you are not tuned into your conscience. You will feel it when you are not. The term, ‘my conscience has been pricked’ means that a person has been thinking thoughts without conscience awareness, then awareness kicks in and pricks the conscience and the person has a change of mind. To any scientist reading this, I am not against ethical science; science with a conscience. I am against con science, science that damages.

.

Posted in Science and non science = nonsense, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

“Have You Stopped beating your Wife?”

“Have You Stopped beating your Wife?”

“Answer me ‘yes’ or ‘no’“.
What a travesty our Justice System is!!! I have just been listening to the Law Report on ABC’s Radio National.
South Australia is considering new changes to laws that govern the behaviour of lawyers.
The Legal Practitioners Act is set to encompass the conduct of lawyers in the course of their professional duties as well as behaviour that occurs outside of their work.
While some of the proposals are being welcomed by reformers there are concerns about the regulatory body’s impartiality and the effectiveness of dealing with fraudulent conduct by insolvent Law firms.

Received only 1 comment:
Diarmuid Hannigan : 16 Apr 2013 6:49:40pm

If the ACCC were to investigate the legal profession for running a cartel, I wonder what they would discover.
Legal Services Commissioners operate under Legal Professional Acts. These acts do not incorporate consumer rights therefore when legal services commissioners investigate consumer complaints against lawyers, consumers are denied their consumer rights.
The reason this hole has been created in the law is because the legal profession is self regulating and creates laws to suit itself which in my humble opinion exactly how a cartel operates.
……………………………………………………………….
I am never surprised when I hear of yet another Stupid Law or Crappy piece of Legislation. There are few things that irk me more than Judges, Lawyers, Barristers or Solicitors getting away with breaking the Law, by circumventing the Law Process because of clever manipulation and phrasing of words to look like it means something else.

It also irks me to know that a person who can pay for the best Barrister can get off a crime as horrific as murder on a technicality, but a person of no means, who cannot pay, can be sentenced to Life Imprisonment in spite of being innocent. It is also unfathomable that a Judge can flaunt the Law as in the case of Marcus Richard Einfeld (born 22 September 1938) is a retired Australian justice of the Federal Court of Australia and the Supreme Courts of New South Wales, Western Australia and the Australian Capital Territory; a former President of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission; a UNICEF Ambassador for Children; a longtime spokesperson both for and against Israeli and Jewish causes and a convicted perjurer. His public life came to an end in 2009 when he became the first Australian former superior court judge to be imprisoned.[1] He was sentenced to three years in prison for perjury and for attempting to pervert the course of justice.[2]

In 1977, Einfeld was appointed a Queen’s Counsel (QC), but his commission was revoked on 26 November 2008.[3] On 23 July 2009 the NSW Court of Appeal found that he was guilty of professional misconduct, was not a fit and proper person to remain on the roll of lawyers and ordered he be removed from it.[4] The NSW Bar Association had applied to have him struck from the roll. Einfeld agreed not to apply for re-admission.[5] His membership of the Order of Australia was also rescinded on 24 April 2009.[6] Outside the field of the law, Einfeld has been a social activist in Australia and the Pacific region. (Wikipedia: Marcus Richard Einfeld)

Some years ago a BDSM prostitute was interviewed live on television. She said that in the main her clients were Judges. They would get down on their knees and beg to be whipped. Now let us analyse this behaviour: is it possible that the Judges were feeling a tad guilty for sentencing another human being for doing something that they had done and got away with? Or do those Judges have psychological problems? Why would anyone want to be whipped? She also said that one Judge liked her to stand on his back in stiletto high heels and whip the crap out of him. Surely this Judge couldn’t be married or else his wife would see the whip marks when they went to bed, unless of course they didn’t share a bedroom. Someone else may have something further to add as to why anyone would actually like being whipped. And why a Judge no less.

Nearly as bad are corrupt Police. They raid premises, confiscate drugs and money, keep the money and either use the drugs themselves or sell on. In my home town there was a huge seizure of marijuana and it was being held in the lockup. But the next day, it had mysteriously disappeared, all of it. I wonder who took it; someone who had access to the key.

Corrupt police: Terence Murray “Terry” Lewis (born 29 February 1928) is a former Queensland Police commissioner who was convicted and jailed for corruption and forgery as a result of the Fitzgerald Inquiry. He was stripped of his knighthood and other honours and awards in consequence.[1] Judge Healy sentenced Lewis to the maximum jail term possible – 14 years on the 15 corruption charges and 10 years on the forgery charge – to be served concurrently, fixed a non-parole period of 9½ years, and fined Lewis $50,000 on each of the corruption charges. Lewis was paroled in 2002 after serving 10½ years. He has continued to protest his innocence, and sued his former lawyers and pursued further appeals.[9] However his appeals failed in August 2005.[10]
………………………………………………………………………………
Corrupt detective jailed over theft, extortion Posted Thu Apr 5, 2012 5:44pm AEST
Former Sydney detective Christopher Laycock has been jailed for seven-and-a-half years for crimes he committed nearly 10 years ago while in the police force. Laycock pleaded guilty to five charges of theft and corruption, including aggravated break and enter, unlawfully accessing a police computer with intent to steal, corruptly receiving a benefit as reward for providing police information and lying to the Police Integrity Commission.

The former detective sergeant also admitted to four other matters including obtaining $11,000 by deception when he went into a man’s house to steal but pretended to be on police business. In sentencing Laycock to prison with a non-parole period of four-and-a-half years, Judge Jonathan Williams said the former cop had used his “position and power” to commit serious criminal offences. “He had no entitlement to operate in that way,” the judge said in the Downing Centre District Court. He said Laycock had committed a “twofold breach of trust” by breaking his own rules as a police officer as well as betraying community expectations of the force. Laycock joined the service in 1989 and was sacked in 2004 after a PIC hearing revealed he and others had been involved in a series of thefts and extortions.

They included receiving $3,900 when he tipped off a doctor who was being investigated over a child pornography network. He advised the doctor to cleanse or get rid of his computer and dispose of his credit cards and told him how to conduct himself if interviewed by police. The doctor was never charged with any offence.

Judge Williams said Laycock’s actions in relation to that incident had frustrated police investigations into what could have been potentially “very serious” offences. But the judge noted Laycock’s lack of prior criminal record, his good prospects of rehabilitation and the “public disgrace and humiliation” he had already gone through. He also said that as a former policeman, Laycock would be at more risk in prison than other inmates. Laycock will be in protective custody and will be eligible for parole in 2016.
ABC/AAP

Corrupt politicians are as bad. We have several cases going on in Australia right now, one such case is that of Edie Obead. Business interests and corruption allegations

Initially working as a taxi driver and then property developer,[10] the source of Obeid’s initial wealth and business is not clear.[31] However, it is known that Obeid, together with his two brothers, inherited their father’s estate that comprised land and houses in Lebanon.[8] In 1973, Obeid together with business partners, purchased an interest in the recently established Arabic press, El-Telegraph Newspaper, with Obeid later buying out his business partners.[32] Obeid has since sold his stake and is, “no longer the publisher of that paper”.[33]

In September 2002, The Sydney Morning Herald alleged that Obeid was one of NSW’s richest members of parliament.[13][34] Media reports claimed that Obeid had purchased a property in Clovelly for $AUD875,000 in 1991 and the following day sold the property to the New South Wales Department of Housing for A$AUD1.1 million.[10] The Herald also claimed that two companies associated with Obeid have had debts of $AUD5 million written off by various banks.[13] It was also alleged that the Obeid family trust secured a loan from the Colonial State Bank for $AUD18 million. The Herald also sourced an internal document from Macquarie Bank, claiming:[13]

“ (Mr Obeid’s) financial position is complex, with investments in his various companies and projects being difficult to analyse due to the cross ownership with third parties. ”
These allegations arose at the same time as The Herald alleged that Obeid had attempted to solicit a A$1 million payment in return for promising NSW Government support for the Canterbury Bulldogs League Club’s A$800 million Oasis housing development in south-western Sydney.[11] As a result of these allegations, the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) conducted an inquiry and found that there was no evidence that any donation was made to the Labor Party in relation to the project. The Commission made a finding that Obeid had never solicited a donation and cleared him of any wrongdoing.[12] In the meantime, The Herald reports for a series of articles concerning Canterbury Bulldogs salary cap breaches and the above (false) allegations had won a Gold Walkley.[35] Obeid commenced defamation action against Fairfax Media and in 2006 the Supreme Court found that Obeid had been defamed and that the media article had contributed to Obeid losing his job as a NSW minister. Obeid was awarded A$162,173 in damages, plus costs believed to have been more than A$1 million.[36] Walkley Awards organisers later said the judging panel, “would not have awarded the prize if it had known the allegations against Mr Obeid would be found to be unsubstantiated”.[37]

Obeid’s family have property interests in Lebanon, Port Macquarie,[34] Terrigal, Bylong Valley,[25] Woolwich and Hunters Hill,[25] and Concord (since sold);[38] and business interests in live sheep exporting to Syria and Iraq.[19]

In November 2012, the New South Wales ICAC began a series of investigative hearings relating to Obeid’s alleged property and mining interests. This inquiry concerns, among other issues, the circumstances surrounding a decision made in 2008 by the then Minister for Primary Industries and Minister for Mineral Resources, Ian Macdonald, to open a mining area in the Bylong Valley for coal exploration. These circumstances include whether Macdonald’s decision was influenced by Obeid.[39] After the presentation of the ICAC’s opening statements, NSW Opposition Leader, John Robertson asked the NSW Labor Party to suspend Obeid’s party membership.[40] The witnesses list for the inquiry included former NSW Premiers Morris Iemma and Nathan Rees and Frank Sartor.[41][42] The inquiry is ongoing.(Wikipedia Edie Obeid)

I was nearly raped by two detectives in Melbourne. I called the police when my shop was broken into. Two plain clothed detectives came to my house at night when I was alone. They barged into my house and searched it. They found money hidden under my mattress and stole it. They sat me down at my dining room table and interrogated me. After falsely accusing me of everything from ‘living of the earnings’ to false reporting of a burglary, they had me in tears. One detective asked the other to wait outside, which he did and then he tried to rape me. But I fought back and I bit him, he slapped my face and I bit him again, harder. He then told me that he didn’t need to take a woman by force, as he had plenty of women chasing him and he left. So who could I report that to? I don’t know that I’d bite again, as I don’t want to be in contact with anyone’s blood for several reasons. A man who is capable of rape is capable of having HIV or Hepatitis C etc.

Posted in Justice | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Empowering Women: (wo men) To be read by men as well

Empowering Women: (wo men) To be read by men as well

The following is an excerpt from another article/blog I wrote: About Men.
I’m going to take this opportunity now to talk about gender and words that represent it in some way. Let’s take the word He for instance. See how I am forced to bring up the male first. Because that is the sequence with which men have wrongfully placed themselves. There is ‘he’ and then for the female equivalent, you tack on an s. But please notice, the S goes before the he, not after as males seem to assume. That would be hes and there is no such word. Women are not appendages to men. No man has the right to think like that, but almost all men do. Next let’s take the word male. See how this plays out male barging in again in first position? Doesn’t stand back and let the yin go first. When we change the gender, are you with me? What do you do? You put fe before male. Not after as males have always demanded. If it was an appendage the word would be Malefe. That does not sound right. Personally, I do not appreciate having the word male, man, men and he as part of my word describing my gender. Men should understand their true position in the order of things. Men are not superior to women. There we have yet another word. Starting yet again with the male gender word man. To change the gender did you add on a suffix or was a prefix placed in front of man? In front yet again. It is wo. In fact with every one the addition is placed in front.

It really would help things along greatly if women, females broke away from men when writing the words for gender identification. So I advocate S instead of she. Fe or fem instead of female and wo instead of woman. End of excerpt.
……………………………………………………………
You will just have to get used to me using S for she, fem for female and wo for woman and wos for women. However if someone can come up with something better and totally different that I like, I will gladly use that/them.
Firstly wos have been indoctrinated to believe they are inferior to men. We are not. In fact may I be so bold as to say that fems are superior to men in general. Men have forced their superiority on to wos due solely to their sheer physical strength. What is laughable through indoctrination is that even a physically weak man still thinks he is superior to all fems, even a physically strong wo. Of course some men are superior to some wos. It is incorrect to say that all hu mans are equal. We are not in the physical form and I know this as I am a Gnostic. In the greater scheme of things, yes we are all equal. We all start our evolution from scratch and we all end up in the same place, however some take longer than others. Let’s just stick to physical and present incarnation for now.
I will allow men to put forward their argument as to why they think the male gender is superior to wos. Please make a list of all the beneficial things men can do better than wos can, excluding physical strength; remembering all the while that wos have not been afforded the same opportunities as men, now or in the past.
Men have taken on the role of head of the family, but look at communities where it is a matriarchal society and see how well they thrive.
Matriarchy from Wikipedia: Matriarchy is a society in which females, especially mothers, have the central roles of political leadership, moral authority, and control of property. It is also sometimes called a gynarchy, a gynocracy, a gynaecocracy, or a gynocentric society.
Most anthropologists hold that there are no known societies that are unambiguously matriarchal,[3][4][5][6][7] but possible exceptions include the Iroquois, in whose society mothers exercise central moral and political roles.[8] However, this reluctance to accept the existence of matriarchies might be based on a specific, culturally biased notion of how to define ‘matriarchy’: because in a patriarchy ‘men rule over women’, a matriarchy has frequently been conceptualized as ‘women ruling over men’, whereas in reality women-centered societies are – largely without exception – egalitarian.[9][10]
There are also matrilinear, matrilocal, and avunculocal societies, especially among indigenous peoples of the Americas, Asia, and Africa,[11] such as those of the Minangkabau, E De (Rhade), Mosuo, Berbers and Tuareg and, in Europe, e.g., Sardinian people.[12][13]
Strongly matrilocal societies sometimes are referred to as matrifocal, and there is some debate concerning the terminological delineation between matrifocality and matriarchy. Even in patriarchical systems of male-preference primogeniture, there may occasionally be queens regnant.
In 19th century Western scholarship, the hypothesis of matriarchy representing an early stage of human development—now mostly lost in prehistory, with the exception of some so-called primitive societies—enjoyed popularity. The hypothesis survived into the 20th century and was notably advanced in the context of feminism and especially second wave feminism, but this hypothesis of matriarchy as having been an early stage of human development is mostly discredited today, most experts saying that it never existed.[14] End quote. And may I add, discredited by men.
A physically strong person can always laud it over a physically weak person. A man has been able to keep wos subjugated due only to their physical strength. If wos were not accorded the opportunity of education, then is it any wonder that men ‘appeared’ to be superior? And isn’t it totally unbelievable that in some countries today, wos are still subjugated and not afforded any sort of education? A person cannot teach themselves to read and write, certainly if there are no books in a household to read. When learning to read, we start with baby books and progress. A child cannot pick up an adult book and expect to be able to work out how to read it. And how can a wo know anything if they are not taught? In some countries they even shoot to kill children fems that want to be educated. That is not only injustice, a crime, but will cause immeasurable bad karma. Little do they know it, ignorant as they are.
What do you suppose the reason is for subjugating fems by men? Please think about this before you read on. ????????????? Isn’t in fact that men are terrified of losing their wrongful position as head of the family, head of the corporation, position of authority or Head of State? A position usurped is a position feared of failure to keep. If fems are educated, all they have left is physical strength and unfortunately for many men this has become their weapon to keep fems in their place; a place beneath them in more ways than one. Many fems are treated like servants, they get less pay even in ‘so called progressive’ countries where work is equal. They often do menial work that men are not prepared to do. A fem is often disrespected merely for being born fe. And in some countries fe babies are killed. This is the 21st Century, how can this still be?
In Australia fems out number males 2 to one in academia. Two thirds of college graduates are fem, yet the myth that men are superior to fems is still prevailing. Why? I will tell you why, it is fear. Fear on the part of men who cannot stand to see their power whittled away and will do anything to keep their superior position in the world and in the minds of wos and all people for that matter.
Luckily not all men are like this. There are respectful men, there are men who value fems and in some families fems wear the pants, to use an old fashioned expression. In fact my mother did not allow anything to happen without her approval. This was achieved through money. My mother came from a rich family and inherited a small fortune. My father though from an upper class family was poor, so she lauded it over him. So there are two things that speak loudly, money and physical strength. Once a wo has found the means to make a lot of money, she can usually laud it over a man who has none. This isn’t good either.
A superior person is an intelligent person who considers all spoken words and tasks to be for the benefit of all concerned. A person who designs a bomb may be intelligent, but they are not benefiting all concerned, certainly not the masses for whom the bomb is dropped upon. People who design bombs for maximum destruction are only concerned with their country of allegiance and the money it will make them. They have no concept of the suffering they cause and neither do they care.
…………………………………………………………………………………………………..
This part is for fems only
Fems and wos of every country of the world must stand up to men and not tolerate disrespect for no good reason, not tolerate degradation nor subjugation for any reason. Wos must take steps to educate themselves, band together to form groups, (safety in numbers) and strive for positions of authority. Make sure that once you have achieved a position of authority that you do not abuse it. Set an example of how things should be done and DO NOT copy men and how they did things. Try to always be fair, avoid cronyism at all costs and be egalitarian at least. This does not mean that you have to treat a man in a lower position as your equal, it means that you treat a man in the same position as yourself as equal. Use Facebook and Twitter to put your point across. Join groups and exert your authority. Never let a man talk you down or belittle you. If you know you are right about a certain thing and you know a man is wrong, set about to prove it. We are well on the way already to gaining equality. There are many more CEO’s that are fem this last decade that 2 decades ago. In Australia we have a fem Prime Minister and she is constantly disrespected even by other fems. This is because these fems have been indoctrinated to think fems can’t do the job as well as men. This simply is not true. If the leader of the Opposition were PM of this country, he would not have done an eighth of the job our PM has done so far under very difficult situations. This man and his front bench are inferior to our PM. This man who thinks he is a demi god is nothing but a spoiled brat and his only line of defence is to denigrate our PM not only because she is fem, but because he wants the job at all costs. So he is prepared to lie, smear and scheme to get recognition by the mob where he has the numbers. Pity help us if the mob rules.
My articles/blogs are always controversial. If you don’t care to read controversial posts, don’t read mine.

Posted in On Women | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments